On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 06:02:31PM -0400, Michael Richardson wrote:
> I tried to convince Toerless to go with the MUST-/SHOULD+/SHOULD-
> terminology from IPsecME's RFC8247.
>
> It would be nice if SAAG lifted section 1.1 into a BCP14-like
> document, as I think that it has widespread applicability throughout
> documents that want to establish interoperable crypto.
Is there are reason that RFC8247's {MUST,SHOULD}[-+] wouldn't be
generally applicable beyond crypto? The -/+ thing is about pithily
indicating likelihood of future downgrade/upgrade of the requirement/
recommendation -- seems generally applicable to me.
So.. just update RFC2119.
Nico
--
_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
