Dear Sheng, I have tried to whip up below the necessary information for the WG chair to AD approval request according to RFC7120. As the non-author co-chair, please check if you approve and proceed accordingly.
Thanks Toerless (for the authors of draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control-plane) --- From: [email protected] To: [email protected], [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Subject: OPS-ADs: request for IANA early allocation of codepoints for draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control-plane Dear Rob, Warren For the ANIMA chairs, i hereby request your approval according to RFC7120, section 3.1, point 4, for IANA early allocation of the below described 2 code points to be assigned to draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control-plane. According to RFC7120, section 3.1, point 2, the conditions for early allocation are met. Code point (1) Registry: https://www.iana.org/assignments/smi-numbers/smi-numbers.xhtml#smi-numbers-1.3.6.1.5.5.7.0 Requested Description: id-mod-anima-acpnodename-2020 RFC7120, section 2 conditions for early allocation: (a) "Specification Required", will be published as RFC Expert: Russ Housley (b) specification adequately described in draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control-plane-27, section 6.1.2/6.1.2.1 (c) Specification is stable: No backward compatibility issue introduced by this code-point. (d) Request by implementors for interop testing and question to WG has determined that there is sufficient interest in the community for early allocation. No depletion issue in this registry Code point (2) Registry: https://www.iana.org/assignments/smi-numbers/smi-numbers.xhtml#smi-numbers-1.3.6.1.5.5.7.8 Description: id-mod-anima-acpnodename-2020 Requested Description: id-on-AcpNodeName (a) "Specification Required", will be published as RFC Expert: Russ Housley (b) specification adequately described in draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control-plane-27, section 6.1.2/6.1.2.1 (c) Specification is stable: N/A: N/A: No prior approved spec for this functionality. Prior draft proposed code point (rfc822Name): - Not used in production deployments: - Rejected by IESG for > 1 year, - Backward compatibility undesirable by IESG, WG and draft authors (undesirable complexity). (d) Request by implementors for interop testing and question to WG has determined that there is sufficient interest in the community for early allocation. No depletion issue in this registry For the ANIMA chairs Sheng Jiang _______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
