Hi, Toerless, Rob and Warren, I conform ANIMA WG would like to ask the IANA early allocation for draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control-plane. Please help for the follow-up procedure.
Thanks and best regards, Sheng (as document shepherd with ANIMA chair hat) > -----Original Message----- > From: Toerless Eckert [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, July 7, 2020 12:14 AM > To: Sheng Jiang <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Sheng: Pls. request AD approval for IANA early allocation of code > points for draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control-plane > > Dear Sheng, > > I have tried to whip up below the necessary information for the WG chair to > AD approval request according to RFC7120. As the non-author co-chair, > please check if you approve and proceed accordingly. > > Thanks > Toerless (for the authors of draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control-plane) > > --- > > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected], [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: OPS-ADs: request for IANA early allocation of codepoints for draft- > ietf-anima-autonomic-control-plane > > Dear Rob, Warren > > For the ANIMA chairs, i hereby request your approval according to RFC7120, > section 3.1, point 4, for IANA early allocation of the below described 2 code > points to be assigned to draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control-plane. > > According to RFC7120, section 3.1, point 2, the conditions for early > allocation > are met. > > Code point (1) > Registry: https://www.iana.org/assignments/smi-numbers/smi- > numbers.xhtml#smi-numbers-1.3.6.1.5.5.7.0 > Requested Description: id-mod-anima-acpnodename-2020 RFC7120, section > 2 conditions for early allocation: > (a) "Specification Required", will be published as RFC > Expert: Russ Housley > (b) specification adequately described in > draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control-plane-27, section 6.1.2/6.1.2.1 > (c) Specification is stable: > No backward compatibility issue introduced by this code-point. > (d) Request by implementors for interop testing and question to WG > has determined that there is sufficient interest in the community > for early allocation. > No depletion issue in this registry > > > Code point (2) > Registry: https://www.iana.org/assignments/smi-numbers/smi- > numbers.xhtml#smi-numbers-1.3.6.1.5.5.7.8 > Description: id-mod-anima-acpnodename-2020 Requested Description: id- > on-AcpNodeName > (a) "Specification Required", will be published as RFC > Expert: Russ Housley > (b) specification adequately described in > draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control-plane-27, section 6.1.2/6.1.2.1 > (c) Specification is stable: N/A: > N/A: No prior approved spec for this functionality. > Prior draft proposed code point (rfc822Name): > - Not used in production deployments: > - Rejected by IESG for > 1 year, > - Backward compatibility undesirable by IESG, WG and draft authors > (undesirable complexity). > (d) Request by implementors for interop testing and question to WG > has determined that there is sufficient interest in the community > for early allocation. > No depletion issue in this registry > > For the ANIMA chairs > Sheng Jiang _______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
