On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 12:04:46PM -0400, Michael Richardson wrote: > > Juergen Schoenwaelder <[email protected]> wrote: > > Note that there is also a middle ground, namely an enumeration type > > factored out into an IANA maintained module that is process wise easier > > to extend - should extensions be needed more regularly. > > That would suit me. How do we do that? >
You revise RFC 8366 and do the following: - You define an IANA maintained module defining the enumeration type. - You write IANA considerations for the new module. - You modify the existing module to import and use the enumeration type. - You do not make any modifications to the existing enumerations. - You republish the revised version of RFC 8366. A couple of month later (and after surviving all the reviews), you declare success. I fear there is nothing "cheaper". /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <https://www.jacobs-university.de/> _______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
