Hi Michael,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>
> Sent: Mittwoch, 30. Juni 2021 02:37
> I thought I wrote a really nice ASCII art version of what documents inherit
> from
> RFC8366. I can't find it in my outbox... I wonder if I nuked the draft by
> mistake.
>
> The short of it:
> RFC8366 -> RFC8995 (voucher-request)
> -> constrained-voucher (voucher-request, voucher)
> -> brski-async-enroll (voucher-request)
Would it make sense to also state the voucher for BRSKI-AE as it also uses the
voucher and tries to argue for a new assertion type (agent-proximity)?
> -> jose-voucher (voucher, voucher-request)
Regards
Steffen
>
> and my question was a bit about how we manage all their things inherited.
> It's really the classic CS multiple inheritance problem.
>
> {A Cat is an Mammal
> A Cat is an Four-legged creature
> A Cat is Nocturnal.}
_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list
Anima@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
