The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8995, "Bootstrapping Remote Secure Key Infrastructure (BRSKI)".
-------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6716 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Max Pritikin <priti...@cisco.com> Section: 5.8.3 Original Text ------------- A registrar MAY be configured to ignore (i.e., override the above policy) the history of the device, but it is RECOMMENDED that this only be configured if hardware-assisted (i.e., Transport Performance Metrics (TPM) anchored) Network Endpoint Assessment (NEA) [RFC5209] is supported. Corrected Text -------------- A registrar MAY be configured to ignore (i.e., override the above policy) the history of the device, but it is RECOMMENDED that this only be configured if hardware-assisted (i.e., Trusted Platform Module (TPM) anchored) Network Endpoint Assessment (NEA) [RFC5209] is supported. Notes ----- The logical expansion of 'TPM' in this parenthetical example is the Trusted Platform Module. Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC8995 (draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-45) -------------------------------------- Title : Bootstrapping Remote Secure Key Infrastructure (BRSKI) Publication Date : May 2021 Author(s) : M. Pritikin, M. Richardson, T. Eckert, M. Behringer, K. Watsen Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach Area : Operations and Management Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG _______________________________________________ Anima mailing list Anima@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima