Great. Thanks Sandy. Rob
-----Original Message----- From: Sandy Ginoza <[email protected]> Sent: 20 October 2021 15:26 To: Rob Wilton (rwilton) <[email protected]> Cc: Michael Richardson <[email protected]>; RFC Editor <[email protected]>; Max Pritikin (pritikin) <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected]; Warren Kumari <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8995 (6716) Hi all, > On Oct 20, 2021, at 7:09 AM, Rob Wilton (rwilton) <[email protected]> wrote: > > The RFC editor has verified this errata. > > I presume that we would also like to ask the RFC editor to also add TPM as, > Trusted Platform Module, to the glossary. Good point! We have added this to the abbreviations list [1]: TPM Trusted Platform Module (TPM) [1] https://www.rfc-editor.org/materials/abbrev.expansion.txt Thanks, Sandy > > Thanks, > Rob > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Michael Richardson <[email protected]> >> Sent: 20 October 2021 04:29 >> To: RFC Errata System <[email protected]>; Max Pritikin (pritikin) >> <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected]; >> [email protected]; [email protected]; Rob Wilton (rwilton) >> <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected]; >> [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8995 (6716) >> >> >> please mark as verified, wait for revision. >> >> RFC Errata System <[email protected]> wrote: >>> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8995, >>> "Bootstrapping Remote Secure Key Infrastructure (BRSKI)". >> >>> -------------------------------------- >>> You may review the report below and at: >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6716 >> >>> -------------------------------------- >>> Type: Technical Reported by: Max Pritikin <[email protected]> >> >>> Section: 5.8.3 >> >>> Original Text >>> ------------- >>> A registrar MAY be configured to ignore (i.e., override the above >>> policy) the history of the device, but it is RECOMMENDED that this only >>> be configured if hardware-assisted (i.e., Transport Performance Metrics >>> (TPM) anchored) Network Endpoint Assessment (NEA) [RFC5209] is >>> supported. >> >>> Corrected Text >>> -------------- >>> A registrar MAY be configured to ignore (i.e., override the above >>> policy) the history of the device, but it is RECOMMENDED that this only >>> be configured if hardware-assisted (i.e., Trusted Platform Module (TPM) >>> anchored) Network Endpoint Assessment (NEA) [RFC5209] is supported. >> >>> Notes >>> ----- >>> The logical expansion of 'TPM' in this parenthetical example is the >>> Trusted Platform Module. >> >> As co-author, I totally agree. >> I can't understand why/how that happened. >> Did the rfc-editor expand our TLA? >> >> >> >> -- >> Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) >> Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide > _______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
