And chiming n with my own opinion, repeating what i said on the microphone at
IETF112:
I would really like to see a reference example, for example in a
new section:
- as simple as possible, but still exploiting all aspects of the draft
and showing the value of the draft.
- i always love a good topology ASCII picture to go along with an example.
- specific enough so that it could be implemented and verified.
- seems like this could be some kind of "detnet-like"?! improved
QoS service for some traffic class (how is the traffic class specified)..
etc.pp: aka: answering all the question to round up such an
example is the easiest way to determine if there are just minor
or any mayor gaps in the proposed approach.
Thanks!
Toerless
On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 03:17:27AM +0100, Toerless Eckert wrote:
> The authors of draft-dang-anima-network-service-auto-deployment have asked
> ANIMA WG for
> adoption of the work.
>
> Given how we are probably all still exhausted from IETF112, let me give this
> one a bit more time:
>
> This emails starts a three week call for adoption for
> draft-dang-anima-network-service-auto-deployment
> The adoption call does end when December 6 has passed for everyone on planet
> earth.
>
> draft-dang-anima-network-service-auto-deployment-01
>
> Abstract
>
> This document specifies an autonomic mechanism for resource-based
> network services deployment through the Autonomic Control Plane (ACP)
> in an Autonomic Network. This mechanism uses the GRASP in [RFC8990]
> to exchange the information among the autonomic nodes so that the
> resource among the service path can be coordinated.
>
> So, please check out the document and chime in!
>
> Toerless, for the ANIMA chairs.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Anima mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
