Qin Wu <[email protected]> wrote: >> Are you saying that we should update to RFC8791? Do you think that >> this is a bug-fix?
> [Qin Wu] No, have clarified in the separate message, I think both
> yang-data and sx:structure can be used, but sx:structure is not
> targeted to replace yang-data, but RESTCONFbis in the future may
> consider to decouple yang-data from RFC8040.
I have not yet merged https://github.com/anima-wg/voucher/pull/17
when producing draft-ietf-anima-rfc8366-00.
I would like the WG to review the results a bit more first, and I would like
a bit more assurance that moving from RESTCONF->RFC8791 would be considered an
acceptable bug fix when going from Proposed Standard to Internet Standard.
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
