Hi, Michael and All: -----邮件原件----- 发件人: Michael Richardson [mailto:[email protected]] 发送时间: 2022年1月12日 9:25 收件人: Qin Wu <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected] 主题: Re: [Anima] Call for adoption: draft-richardson-anima-rfc8366bis, ends December 19th, 2021
Qin Wu <[email protected]> wrote: >> Are you saying that we should update to RFC8791? Do you think that >> this is a bug-fix? > [Qin Wu] No, have clarified in the separate message, I think both > yang-data and sx:structure can be used, but sx:structure is not > targeted to replace yang-data, but RESTCONFbis in the future may > consider to decouple yang-data from RFC8040. I have not yet merged https://github.com/anima-wg/voucher/pull/17 when producing draft-ietf-anima-rfc8366-00. I would like the WG to review the results a bit more first, and I would like a bit more assurance that moving from RESTCONF->RFC8791 would be considered an acceptable bug fix when going from Proposed Standard to Internet Standard. [Qin Wu] I am wondering when the name of the structure is encoded as a "container" and such structure contains multiple leafs, whether we should have a separate container, let's say container A to wrap all the leaf nodes, from space convention in section 3 of RFC8791, structure <structure-name>: +--<node> +--<node> | +--<node> +--<node> It seems to me that one separate container node A under "structure <structure-name>" is needed, the benefit to add a separate container A is when you augment structure <structure-name>, you can easily introduce additional leaf node under container A. But I am not sure add multiple leaf node directly under structure <structure-name> is really **allowed**?, since we don't have too many consumer of RFC8791, can Martin or Andy help answer this since you are authors of this work. @Martin and Andy, Thanks! -- Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide _______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
