We were discussing the /.well-known/cmp that is in being proposed in draft-ietf-lamps-cmp-updates, We were comparing it to /.well-known/brski and /.well-known/est. https://www.iana.org/assignments/well-known-uris/well-known-uris.xhtml#well-known-uris-1
BRSKI has a sub-registry at: https://www.iana.org/assignments/brski-parameters/brski-parameters.xhtml#brski-well-known-uris Question 1) Why isn't the sub-registry referenced in the /.well-known registry? It seems like the sub-registry should be linked in the related information. Question 2) Should the CMP document be establishing a registry or not? -- ] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [ ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | IoT architect [ ] [email protected] http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [ -- Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
