Sean Turner <[email protected]> wrote: > When the /.well-known/est/ was registered we only did the top level, > i.e., /est/. There are no registries for the /.well-known/est/*this > part*. It’s not clear to me that you need to do anything more than get > /.well-known/cmp.
Yes, and then we updated it with RFC8995, but at the last minute, we moved
all the new stuff into /.well-known/brski and established a registry.
> What will be the registration policy [0] for the ‘p’ values? I assume
> FCFS (first come first served)?
I would think Specification Required if it's going to be part of a deployable
infrastructure. (Not IETF Specification!)
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
