As announced at IETF 113, Hendrik, Steffen and I have meanwhile closed
the open TBD 
regarding detail on the CMP instance of BRSKI-AE, which we propose to
call BRSKI-CMP.

Today I've been able to publish the next version of the draft,
which after renaming resides
at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-anima-brski-ae

A diff of the current version (which is -01 after I had to submit a
fixup of -00
and the version was reset to -00 due to changing the title)
with the preceding
one https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-anima-brski-async-enroll-05
can be found
at https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-anima-brski-ae-00.

There is also a PDF version that includes a neat protocol overview
graphics at 
https://github.com/anima-wg/anima-brski-ae/blob/main/draft-ietf-anima-brski-ae.pdf
Due to IMO extreme limitations on the structure of SVG input
I was unable to keep the graphics in the submitted version -
details on this may be found
at https://github.com/anima-wg/anima-brski-ae/issues/22.

The contents of the current version should be pretty stable already, not
far from being ready for WGLC.
On behalf of all authors of this draft, I ask those interested in the
topic on feedback on this version.

 David



On Wed, 2022-04-06 at 07:12 -0700, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote:
> 
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Autonomic Networking Integrated Model
> and Approach WG of the IETF.
> 
>         Title           : BRSKI-AE: Alternative Enrollment Protocols
> in BRSKI
>         Authors         : David von Oheimb
>                           Steffen Fries
>                           Hendrik Brockhaus
>                           Eliot Lear
>         Filename        : draft-ietf-anima-brski-ae-01.txt
>         Pages           : 30
>         Date            : 2022-04-06
> 
> Abstract:
>    This document enhances Bootstrapping Remote Secure Key
> Infrastructure
>    (BRSKI, RFC 8995) to allow employing alternative enrollment
>    protocols, such as CMP.
> 
>    Using self-contained signed objects, the origin of enrollment
>    requests and responses can be authenticated independently of
> message
>    transfer.  This supports end-to-end security and asynchronous
>    operation of certificate enrollment and provides flexibility where
> to
>    authenticate and authorize certification requests.
> 
> 
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-anima-brski-ae/
> 
> There is also an htmlized version available at:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-anima-brski-ae-01
> 
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-anima-brski-ae-01
> 
> 
> Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at
> rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts
_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list
Anima@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima

Reply via email to