On 23-Aug-22 21:56, Toerless Eckert wrote:

Agreed. My opininion is that the mandatory-to-verify is not at the
level of the flood-message, but at the objective definition level.

If that's the case, we are on the wrong track. Should we be discussing
signing GRASP objectives, rather than messages?

In many ways, that would be much easier to design and retro-fit.

   Brian

_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list
Anima@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima

Reply via email to