On 23-Aug-22 21:56, Toerless Eckert wrote:
Agreed. My opininion is that the mandatory-to-verify is not at the level of the flood-message, but at the objective definition level.
If that's the case, we are on the wrong track. Should we be discussing signing GRASP objectives, rather than messages? In many ways, that would be much easier to design and retro-fit. Brian _______________________________________________ Anima mailing list Anima@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima