Brian E Carpenter <[email protected]> wrote: > On 23-Aug-22 21:56, Toerless Eckert wrote:
>> Agreed. My opininion is that the mandatory-to-verify is not at the
>> level of the flood-message, but at the objective definition level.
> If that's the case, we are on the wrong track. Should we be discussing
> signing GRASP objectives, rather than messages?
That might better fit the goals.
Probably we should have started with a few use cases.
> In many ways, that would be much easier to design and retro-fit.
cool.
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
