Hi Carsten, Jaime, IANA still needs an IESG-designated expert to sign off on the Resource Type (rt=) Link Target Attribute Values registrations in version -12. Does this work?
We would make the registrations when the IESG approves the document for publication. thanks, Amanda On Fri Aug 19 08:52:55 2022, esko.d...@iotconsultancy.nl wrote: > (Though I wasn't asked, adding my 2 cents here ...) > > It looks like the issue is resolved: the new descriptions don't > mention ports anymore but rather mention the type of resource that the > rt represents. This is somewhat more generally phrased than for some > other rt types, but I don't see this as a problem. The draft explains > how the rt types are used in BRSKI and they don't intend to be used in > a wider scope at the moment. In other words, the descriptions may > sound a bit "vague" but that is done on purpose. > > One thing to note is that the brski.rjp resource type is now used in > the -12 draft to point to a URI/link that uses another scheme, > specifically "coaps+jpy" , and not the usual coap/coaps. The > description of the brski.rjp type is nevertheless kept more general > than that, it could point to any other (future?) Join-Proxy-specific > resources of a BRSKI Registrar also, which may use other schemes. > > So overall to me it looks good. And as Carsten indicated, we anyway > don't need full consensus to perform the registration now already. > > Regards > Esko > > -----Original Message----- > From: core-parameters <core-parameters-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of > Amanda Baber via RT > Sent: Friday, August 19, 2022 02:27 > Cc: jaime.jime...@ericsson.com; c...@tzi.org; core-paramet...@ietf.org > Subject: [core-parameters] [IANA #1229125] expert review for draft- > ietf-anima-constrained-join-proxy (core-parameters) > > Hi Carsten, > > Has this been resolved? Is it possible to approve the current version > of these registrations (pending IESG approval for publication)? > > thanks, > Amanda > > On Tue Jul 12 21:25:30 2022, amanda.baber wrote: > > Hi Carsten, Jaime (cc: anima), > > > > Can you approve the Resource Type (rt=) Link Target Attribute Values > > registrations in version -11 of this document? > > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-anima-constrained- > > join-proxy > > > > thanks, > > Amanda > > > > On Thu Apr 07 21:44:01 2022, sabrina.tanamal wrote: > > > Hi Carsten, > > > > > > We have a response from the author: > > > > > > Thanks for your reaction. > > > Suggestion for new readable titles are below. I will insert them in > > > the coming version 10 of the draft. > > > > > > __________________________________________________________________ > > > OLD > > > Attribute Value: brski.jp > > > Description: This BRSKI resource type is used to query and > > > return > > > the > > > supported BRSKI (CoAP over DTLS) port of the > > > constrained > > > Join Proxy. > > > Reference: [this document] > > > > > > Attribute Value: brski.rjp > > > Description: This BRSKI resource type is used to query and return > > > the > > > supported BRSKI JPY protocol port of the Registrar. > > > Reference: [this document] > > > > > > NEW > > > > > > Attribute Value: brski.jp > > > Description: This BRSKI resource type is used to query and return > > > the > > > supported BRSKI resources of the constrained Join > > > Proxy. > > > Reference: [this document] > > > > > > Attribute Value: brski.rjp > > > Description: This BRSKI resource type is used for the constrained > > > Join > > > Proxy > > > to query and return Join Proxy specific BRSKI > > > resources > > > of a Registrar. > > > Reference: [this document] > > > > > > ___________________________________________________________ > > > Hope this is understandable enough, > > > > > > ==== > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > Sabrina Tanamal > > > Lead IANA Services Specialist > > > > > > On Tue Apr 05 20:30:05 2022, c...@tzi.org wrote: > > > > Hi Sabrina, > > > > > > > > I looked at the registration requests in the draft. > > > > They use somewhat unusual language about discovering ports - > > > > resource > > > > discovery is understood to discover resources. For brski.jp, > > > > this > > > > appears to be about discovering a CoAP or CoAPs entry point > > > > (without > > > > describing how exactly that is then used, e.g., what happens if > > > > that > > > > has a different IP address in the authority than the request > > > > address). > > > > For brski.rjp, this appears to be about discovering an entry > > > > point > > > > for > > > > a protocol that I don’t seem to fully understand the description > > > > for. > > > > > > > > I didn’t try to obtain a deep understanding of the protocol > > > > before > > > > writing this, but I would prefer if the language used for the > > > > description were understandable for other registrants in this > > > > registry, i.e., discussing resources, not ports (port numbers?). > > > > > > > > All the other criteria for a registration appear to be fulfilled. > > > > > > > > I don’t think we need to reach a consensus between the designated > > > > experts before proceeding. > > > > > > > > Grüße, Carsten > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 2022-04-05, at 18:43, Sabrina Tanamal via RT <drafts-expert- > > > > > review-comm...@iana.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Carsten and Jaime (cc: anima WG), > > > > > > > > > > As the designated experts for the Resource Type (rt=) Link > > > > > Target > > > > > Attribute Values registry, can you review the proposed > > > > > registrations > > > > > in draft-ietf-anima-constrained-join-proxy for us? Please see > > > > > > > > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-anima-constrained- > > > > > join- > > > > > proxy/ > > > > > > > > > > If this is OK, when the IESG approves the document for > > > > > publication, > > > > > we'll make the registration at > > > > > > > > > > https://www.iana.org/assignments/core-parameters > > > > > > > > > > If you're the first expert to submit a review, please let us > > > > > know > > > > > whether you want us to wait for both reviewers to respond > > > > > before > > > > > we > > > > > mark the document "IANA OK" (or send your comments to the > > > > > authors, > > > > > if > > > > > the registrations aren't OK). > > > > > > > > > > The IESG has asked us to set a two-week deadline for > > > > > registration > > > > > reviews. The due date for this request is 19 April 2022. > > > > > > > > > > thanks, > > > > > > > > > > Sabrina Tanamal > > > > > Lead IANA Services Specialist > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > core-parameters mailing list > core-paramet...@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core-parameters _______________________________________________ Anima mailing list Anima@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
