Toerless Eckert <t...@cs.fau.de> wrote:
    > I guess i do not understand CoAP well enough, but the wy it sounds to me,
    > unclusion of the Uri option would be a security risk, because it would
    > allow the Pledge to indicate to the constrained proxy which 
registrar/proxy to
    > connect to, right ?

No. The CoAP that the Pledge sends is inside the DTLS.
The CoAP that we are discussing is added by the Join Proxy.


--
Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list
Anima@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima

Reply via email to