Martin Björklund <mbj+i...@4668.se> wrote:
>> This is important to know, as the intention with the augmentation was
>> to extend the voucher with additional values as you did in the example
>> above.
> Ok. Just to be clear; this is not what is defined today. In order to
> get this, 8366bis would have to use sx:structure, and then an 8995bis
> would have to use sx:augment-structure.
But, I think that sx:augment-structure, if done by "B", and then done in a
different document by "C" would result in duplicate data nodes if "D" were to
import both.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list Anima@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
