Want to throw a different proposal in the room.
See proposal in my slides tomorrow, i think we may want to include more
information,
even when the actual variation is just a single string.
Cheers
toerless
On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 05:52:27PM -0400, Michael Richardson wrote:
>
> On 26-Jul-23 09:06, Michael Richardson wrote:
> > Brian E Carpenter <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > That makes sense, but it probably needs to be normatively specified,
> > > which would avoid any need to change RFC 8995, except perhaps an
> > > erratum to delete that "(list of)" wart.
> > I didn't get the "(list of)" wart...
>
> bc> objective-value = text ; name of the (list of) supported
> bc> ; protocols: "EST-TLS" for RFC 7030.
>
> so, errata I think.
>
> I think it should now say:
>
> objective-value = text ; name of the supported protocols.
> ; e.g., "EST-TLS" for RFC 7030.
>
>
> --
> Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
> Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Anima mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
--
---
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
