Rob Wilton \(rwilton\) <[email protected]> wrote:
> I've trivially tweaked the spacing and changed a full stop to a comma.
WFM.
> Does this look right? If so, I will verify this errata.
> Section 4.3 says:
> objective-value = text ; name of the (list of) supported ;
> protocols: "EST-TLS" for RFC 7030.
> It should say:
> objective-value = text ; name of the supported protocol, ; e.g.,
> "EST-TLS" for RFC 7030.
> Regards, Rob
> -----Original Message----- From: Michael Richardson
> <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, November 9, 2023 8:16 AM To:
> Rob Wilton (rwilton) <[email protected]>; Rebecca VanRheenen
> <[email protected]> Cc: Max Pritikin (pritikin)
> <[email protected]>; [email protected];
> [email protected]; Kent Watsen <[email protected]>;
> [email protected]; RFC Editor <[email protected]> Subject: Re:
> [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8995 (7576)
> Rebecca VanRheenen <[email protected]> wrote:
>> We are unable to verify this erratum that the submitter marked as
>> editorial. Please note that we have changed the “Type” of the
>> following errata report to “Technical”. As Stream Approver, please
>> review and set the Status and Type accordingly (see the definitions at
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata-definitions/).
> I filed this report after some discussion on the list. It fixes a
> comment, rather than the underlying CDDL.
> So I agree that it's not strictly editorial.
>> You may review the report at:
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7576
>> Please see https://www.rfc-editor.org/how-to-verify/ for further
>> information on how to verify errata reports.
>> Further information on errata can be found at:
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata.php.
>> Thank you.
>> RFC Editor/rv
>>> On Jul 26, 2023, at 9:33 AM, RFC Errata System
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8995,
>>> "Bootstrapping Remote Secure Key Infrastructure (BRSKI)".
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------
>>> You may review the report below and at:
>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7576
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------
>>> Type: Editorial Reported by: Michael Richardson
>>> <[email protected]>
>>>
>>> Section: 4.3
>>>
>>> Original Text
>>> -------------
>>> objective-value = text ; name of the (list of) supported ; protocols:
>>> "EST-TLS" for RFC 7030.
>>>
>>>
>>> Corrected Text
>>> --------------
>>> objective-value = text ; name of the supported protocols. ; e.g.,
>>> "EST-TLS" for RFC 7030.
>>>
>>>
>>> Notes
>>> -----
>>> This objective does not support a list of supported protocols. The
>>> comment in the example might lead people to conclude they can do
>>> that.
>>>
>>> Instructions:
>>> -------------
>>> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
>>> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
>>> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in
>>> to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------
>>> RFC8995 (draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-45)
>>> --------------------------------------
>>> Title : Bootstrapping Remote Secure Key Infrastructure (BRSKI)
>>> Publication Date : May 2021 Author(s) : M. Pritikin, M. Richardson,
>>> T. Eckert, M. Behringer, K. Watsen Category : PROPOSED STANDARD
>>> Source : Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach Area :
>>> Operations and Management Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
>>>
> --
> Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works -=
> IPv6 IoT consulting =- *I*LIKE*TRAINS*
> _______________________________________________ Anima mailing list
> [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
