Hi Hohn, Thank you for the review and the comments. I made some proposals to your comments.
Best regards Steffen > -----Original Message----- > From: John Scudder via Datatracker <[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, September 4, 2024 6:59 PM > To: The IESG <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: John Scudder's No Objection on draft-ietf-anima-brski-ae-12: (with > COMMENT) > > John Scudder has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-anima-brski-ae-12: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email > addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory > paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to > https://www.ietf.org/ > %2Fabout%2Fgroups%2Fiesg%2Fstatements%2Fhandling-ballot- > positions%2F&data=05%7C02%7Csteffen.fries%40siemens.com%7C0794ce3ff03 > 74b47795f08dccd02d770%7C38ae3bcd95794fd4addab42e1495d55a%7C1%7C0% > 7C638610659283005753%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMD > AiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata > =a0c7%2FPhFVrDdUqDJFsva8jzxF86iEL2bmhvp2dUJ%2Fzw%3D&reserved=0 > for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.i/ > etf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-ietf-anima-brski- > ae%2F&data=05%7C02%7Csteffen.fries%40siemens.com%7C0794ce3ff0374b477 > 95f08dccd02d770%7C38ae3bcd95794fd4addab42e1495d55a%7C1%7C0%7C6386 > 10659283016279%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIj > oiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=6odMl > wW%2FUvDyKTATFVPsJsqGup2cOV8M7GMcZ8eY2us%3D&reserved=0 > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Thanks for this document. I have two minor comments/nits: > > - please alphabetize your terminology section. [stf] will do so in the next version of the draft. > > - in, "The following terms are described partly in addition." > > I don't know what you mean by "partly". Would the sentence be correct if you > deleted that word? [stf] Yes, we can delete that word, we intended to only provide additional definition when necessary. > > _______________________________________________ Anima mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
