On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 1:33 AM, gabor papp <[email protected]>wrote:
> > has the idea of using OSC's nested addressing to address components in > > different layers? > interesting idea. > > > it seems to me that now every joint in the entire thing has to have a > unique > > name; > two joints can have the same name, so they both receive the message. > also it is possible to send messages to a couple of objects using > regular experessions in the name field, like joint*. although probably > it has been never used, and slows down osc processing, so it will be > probably removed soon. > My issue regards addressing every joint independently; so the pattern matching possibilities don't help. > > > > this make for a lot of work if you're making compositions with many > similar > > (i.e. bodies) but different (i.e. different people!) and want to import > them > > into a bigger sketch.... > an easy workaround could be to search and replace the joint names in the > nmt file using a text editor before import. > precisely what i've been doing, and was hoping to stop doing! only suggested it because the layer structure and OSC's hierarchic messaging structure match so well. and i'm getting better and better at reusing existing bone/joint structure with varying image textures so all my nmt's end up with the same joint names (cuz i start with the same file), unless i rename all; was worth a try :) > > gabor > > _______________________________________________ > animata-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.kitchenbudapest.hu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/animata-users >
_______________________________________________ animata-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.kitchenbudapest.hu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/animata-users
