It may be that we should have an announce list, though, if people want a low traffic way to stay informed about releases. On Jun 25, 2014 1:35 AM, "Randall Leeds" <[email protected]> wrote:
> I don't find the traffic to be too heavy on this list but if we find it to > be so we could do a -dev -user split, which is common. > On Jun 25, 2014 1:28 AM, "Ernesto Torresin (ML)" <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> On 25/06/2014 09:12, Randall Leeds wrote: >> [...] >> >> > The master branch has all reworked packaging and build. >> >> >> >> I switched back to the v1.2.x branch just because the changes in >> >> architecture that are worked upon in the master branch were just >> >> confusing me. Until a 2.x release comes, I'll study v1.2.9. I probably >> >> just passed by at the wrong time; I want to stay tuned but Annotator is >> >> not within the scope of my everyday activity, so I can sync with it >> only >> >> when I decide to stop doing other things, revise my JS books, >> rediscover >> >> the Firebug debugger and dive into your code. >> >> >> >> Thank you >> >> >> > >> > Thanks for your patience! >> > >> >> Hey, why live in a valley of tears? I hope that "patience" won't be >> recorded with dependencies in the package.json :-D ! >> >> I am using this list because I am not aware of any other ML dedicated to >> the Annotator. Actually it sounds incorrect to me to use a *-dev mailing >> list for setup issues like mine, and the ones of several other users here. >> >> Actually, this mailing list is set up so that replies are addressed to >> the original sender by default, and not to the list itself. IMHO this >> may remove some traffic, but mixes things up. I cannot take the >> attention of core developers for silly matters. I came with a simple >> question like "what code should I read?" and I was answered by core >> developers like Nick and Randall. This is just incredible to me, it is >> like being helped by Dries Buytaert for setting up your LAMP. Nick, >> Randall, you deserve more than this... :-)) >> >> So: I would say that the Annotator has a "core" part, and a "plugins" >> ecosystem. >> I *suppose* that it would be possible to split up this list in something >> like >> >> annotator-core-dev >> annotator-plugins-dev >> annotator-support >> >> Of course I'd then subscribe to "annotator-support" first. >> >> I'm writing this mail because I expected to find a lot of discussion >> about this matter within the >500 messages that I received since I >> subscribed to this ML, but to my great surprise, I did not. >> >> Thank you for reading so far. >> >> Ernesto Torresin >> >> >> >>
_______________________________________________ annotator-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/annotator-dev Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/annotator-dev
