I don't find the traffic to be too heavy on this list but if we find it to be so we could do a -dev -user split, which is common. On Jun 25, 2014 1:28 AM, "Ernesto Torresin (ML)" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 25/06/2014 09:12, Randall Leeds wrote: > [...] > >> > The master branch has all reworked packaging and build. > >> > >> I switched back to the v1.2.x branch just because the changes in > >> architecture that are worked upon in the master branch were just > >> confusing me. Until a 2.x release comes, I'll study v1.2.9. I probably > >> just passed by at the wrong time; I want to stay tuned but Annotator is > >> not within the scope of my everyday activity, so I can sync with it only > >> when I decide to stop doing other things, revise my JS books, rediscover > >> the Firebug debugger and dive into your code. > >> > >> Thank you > >> > > > > Thanks for your patience! > > > > Hey, why live in a valley of tears? I hope that "patience" won't be > recorded with dependencies in the package.json :-D ! > > I am using this list because I am not aware of any other ML dedicated to > the Annotator. Actually it sounds incorrect to me to use a *-dev mailing > list for setup issues like mine, and the ones of several other users here. > > Actually, this mailing list is set up so that replies are addressed to > the original sender by default, and not to the list itself. IMHO this > may remove some traffic, but mixes things up. I cannot take the > attention of core developers for silly matters. I came with a simple > question like "what code should I read?" and I was answered by core > developers like Nick and Randall. This is just incredible to me, it is > like being helped by Dries Buytaert for setting up your LAMP. Nick, > Randall, you deserve more than this... :-)) > > So: I would say that the Annotator has a "core" part, and a "plugins" > ecosystem. > I *suppose* that it would be possible to split up this list in something > like > > annotator-core-dev > annotator-plugins-dev > annotator-support > > Of course I'd then subscribe to "annotator-support" first. > > I'm writing this mail because I expected to find a lot of discussion > about this matter within the >500 messages that I received since I > subscribed to this ML, but to my great surprise, I did not. > > Thank you for reading so far. > > Ernesto Torresin > > > >
_______________________________________________ annotator-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/annotator-dev Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/annotator-dev
