I think this might be proposing something like a jinja2 filter that merges
one hash with another and returns it.

I'm not aware of this, but some other folks go deeper than me.

I'm not opposed to a filter plugin function being added that does this
being added if that makes sense.




On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 7:24 PM, Steven Ringo <[email protected]>
wrote:

> To add: would prefer not to use hash_behaviour = merge if possible.
>
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Ansible Project" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ansible-project/f2468b4d-0e07-401e-8f95-fe40405d4fc7%40googlegroups.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ansible-project/f2468b4d-0e07-401e-8f95-fe40405d4fc7%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Ansible Project" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ansible-project/CA%2BnsWgypURazg_F_gEqoXEoig6vxqa%2BU-DYLeDn8UVqr_%3D5feQ%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to