I thought it might be possible to loop over each hash respectively and then create a new one with all of those.
On Friday, 1 August 2014 09:56:39 UTC+10, Michael DeHaan wrote: > > I think this might be proposing something like a jinja2 filter that merges > one hash with another and returns it. > > I'm not aware of this, but some other folks go deeper than me. > > I'm not opposed to a filter plugin function being added that does this > being added if that makes sense. > > > > > On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 7:24 PM, Steven Ringo <[email protected] > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> To add: would prefer not to use hash_behaviour = merge if possible. >> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Ansible Project" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected] <javascript:>. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] >> <javascript:>. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ansible-project/f2468b4d-0e07-401e-8f95-fe40405d4fc7%40googlegroups.com >> >> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ansible-project/f2468b4d-0e07-401e-8f95-fe40405d4fc7%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >> . >> >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ansible Project" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ansible-project/c901cda8-bcf5-4e15-a576-73adeb965e1e%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
