Rajiv Mordani wrote:
>
> > On including .jar files... I really don't think this is a big problem.
> > I do not however like the project-x/javac stuff and I am glad that is
> > gone. However xalan is OSS and our own Dog Food so we should eat it :)
>
> Atleast compare 2 technologies that do the same thing... project X is an
> xml parser and xalan is an xsl engine..
I believe he was saying XERCES, not XALAN :) However, who cares, we have
JAXP (I llllloove it, I can use XERCES and you PROJECT-X without any
change in the source).
> On a separate note could you explain why you don't like project X. It is
> also going to be "OSS and our own Dog Food" soon. Would your opinion change
> then???
Because Project-X is bulky and it's COOOOOORRRRRPPOOOORATTTEEEE :)
hahahahahaha :) Who the hell cares? I mean, the parser is such a stupid
piece in ANT that it was about the time that JSR5 came out :)
I don't want to choose a parser for that, just give me the default
stinkin one... (I want to see it in the next JDK, that's it!)
Pier
--
--------------------------------------------------------------------
- P I E R -
stable structure erected over water to allow the docking of seacraft
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.betaversion.org/~pier/>
--------------------------------------------------------------------
- ApacheCON Y2K: Come to the official Apache developers conference -
-------------------- <http://www.apachecon.com> --------------------
