Pierpaolo Fumagalli wrote: > Rajiv Mordani wrote: > > > > > On including .jar files... I really don't think this is a big problem. > > > I do not however like the project-x/javac stuff and I am glad that is > > > gone. However xalan is OSS and our own Dog Food so we should eat it :) > > > > Atleast compare 2 technologies that do the same thing... project X is an > > xml parser and xalan is an xsl engine.. > > I believe he was saying XERCES, not XALAN :) However, who cares, we have > JAXP (I llllloove it, I can use XERCES and you PROJECT-X without any > change in the source). > > > On a separate note could you explain why you don't like project X. It is > > also going to be "OSS and our own Dog Food" soon. Would your opinion change > > then??? > > Because Project-X is bulky and it's COOOOOORRRRRPPOOOORATTTEEEE :)
The latter I agree but not the former... > hahahahahaha :) Who the hell cares? I mean, the parser is such a stupid > piece in ANT that it was about the time that JSR5 came out :) Yep I agree with you on this one.. I am waiting for the 7th of March before checking in the changes for ant to use JAXP as I don't want to break the tomcat folks who are doing a beta on that date. > I don't want to choose a parser for that, just give me the default > stinkin one... (I want to see it in the next JDK, that's it!) > > Pier > > -- > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > - P I E R - > stable structure erected over water to allow the docking of seacraft > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.betaversion.org/~pier/> > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > - ApacheCON Y2K: Come to the official Apache developers conference - > -------------------- <http://www.apachecon.com> -------------------- > -- UNIX _is_ user friendly, he's just very picky about who his friends are.
