Thanks Arnout and Duncan, Don't get me wrong. I can live with JDK 1.2 if Ant gains something by making stronger requirements.
I wanted to be convinced that there _is_ a gain though. >>>>> "JDD" == James Duncan Davidson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: JDD> HP/UX has had decent JDK 1.2 support since forever ago. Hmm, then my customer must have missed something. Might be it's because they are sticking with HP/UX 10 ... >> Where would Ant benefit from JDK 1.2? JDD> File.listRoots() -- could be damn handy in resolving file names JDD> that start with a letter':' pattern. Yep. JDD> File.setLastModified() Must have missed that. So this is the portable touch task from the TODO list, right? JDD> There's other things, mostly small, but useful to not have to JDD> recreate. You've convinced me, but then my development platforms are Linux and NT. Guess those who have to use one of the other platforms will be more difficult to convince. Stefan
