> Regarding System.properties - it's fine as long as we do implement > the "properties at the project level" - if we need user.home it's > enough to use a simple Task that will set the project properties.
Or the code that needs it can just ask System.getProperty(). :) > I hope that project-level properties doesn't mean only strings - if the > access is via API it's possible ( and good) to permit Attributes too. I think that we're really interested in making these typed wherever it makes since... .duncan
