on 8/1/00 3:38 PM, Eugen Kuleshov at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I've read your document whiteboard\utah\design guide.xml from current > Ant snapshot. There are great ideas.
Actually, the Utah stuff is superceed by the "spec" document which is also in the repository. But thanks ! :) > But I have just small comment. How > about create DTD for build.xml file. It helps to validate build.xml > strucrure and make much simplier creating GUI tools for managing > build.xml By design, the build.xml file can't have a DTD that works in all case. The structure would have to change. There is a tool in the current distribution that lets you build a DTD from a set of tasks that will work. Most of the recent editors to come out are starting to acknowledge that XML has powerful uses that aren't 1:1 compatible with DTDs. For example, the new XMetal allows creating XML docs that don't have a DTD. In any case, please continue this conversation on the Ant-Dev mailing list. I don't really like having technical discussions on Ant outside of that forum. :) .duncan
