Looking at the current documentation it strikes me as cumbersome in some parts, in particular when explaining nested attributes.
It seem that we could do a better job on pointing out details if we where to include the DTD or XMLSchema fragment associated with each particular construct. XMLSchema would probably be a better choice, since I think allows expressing inheritance and such which we use all the time. Actually, it would be nice it the task where to provide the ability to generate their our Schema/DTD fragment. With that, it would be possible to accurately generate all the definitions for ANT. What people think. > -----Original Message----- > From: Conor MacNeill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2000 4:27 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Javadoc Task - specify multiple "-link" values. > > > Jason, > > Have a look at the documentation for the javadoc task. Go to > the section of > nested elements and you will see how to have multiple <link> > elements. There > is also an example with multiple elements. > > I think it may be good to deprecate the following attributes > -group > -link > -linkoffline > > in favour of their nested element counterparts. > > Conor > > > -- > Conor MacNeill > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cortex eBusiness > http://www.cortexebusiness.com.au > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jason Stell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, 21 September 2000 6:55 > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Javadoc Task - specify multiple "-link" values. > > > > > > Any idea how to do this? Similar issue exists with the "linkoffline" > > property. > > > > Also -- anyone know how to get javadoc to use a proxy server...? > > > > > > Thx. > > >
