At 11:00 21/9/00 -0700, you wrote: >Looking at the current documentation it strikes me as cumbersome in some >parts, in particular when explaining nested attributes. > >It seem that we could do a better job on pointing out details if >we where to include the DTD or XMLSchema fragment associated with each >particular construct. > >XMLSchema would probably be a better choice, since I think allows expressing >inheritance and such which we use all the time. >Actually, it would be nice it the task where to provide the ability to >generate their our Schema/DTD fragment. With that, it would be possible to >accurately generate all the definitions for ANT. > >What people think.
there is already a task to generate the DTD for tasks - not sure of its name (ant-structure ???) but I guess you could extend it to do XSchemas as well Cheers, Pete *------------------------------------------------------* | "Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want | | to test a man's character, give him power." | | -Abraham Lincoln | *------------------------------------------------------*
