On 11/15/00 12:13 AM, "Stefan Bodewig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Personally I don't care much which regexp processor is going to be
> used, maybe we could even put an interface layer in between so the
> user can choose which processor to use (like style does for Xalan or
> XSL:P). Not that high a priority though.
I'd rather not make things *that* flexible. :) If we are going to have one
regexp engine or another in our build, we should just depend on it being
checked out along side and build it in. :)
--
James Duncan Davidson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
!try; do()
