Peter Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > While I won't block such a move I think it is possibly an example of > flexability syndrome mentioned a few days ago. Can you think of any > *good* use case for changing the value of either name or default > attributes of project or name attribute of target?
Not really. I do see valid use cases for setting project's basedir based on user.home for example. > I see much much danger in evaluating depends attributes. If we were going to expand them at runtime that is, right. Actually I was proposing to expand them at parser time - should have been clearer. > Besides the fact that has been asked for can you think of any good > reasons to include it? Consistency. Stefan
