At 02:13 9/1/01 -0500, Jason Rosenberg wrote: >Are there plans to make -quiet flag have the >behavior indicated below, by default, instead of >having to set the -logger, and modify echo, etc.?
There was discussion about changing behaviour of echo a while back but a bunch of people complained so it wasn't changed I believe. Thou I would like to see the change I don't think we can in the Ant1.x series. >It seems to me that we need to have a standard >flag, which probably should just be the current >'-quiet', which has the effect of only printing >out a visited target when that target has some >output. Nope - we aren't going to change anything that is not backwards compatable - at least thats what I believe we decided. Backwards incompatable changes will liekyl wait till 2.0+ Cheers, Pete *-----------------------------------------------------* | "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, | | and proving that there is no need to do so - almost | | everyone gets busy on the proof." | | - John Kenneth Galbraith | *-----------------------------------------------------*
