At 08:16 9/1/01 +1100, Conor MacNeill wrote: >> >> Nope - we aren't going to change anything that is not backwards >compatable >> - at least thats what I believe we decided. Backwards incompatable >changes >> will liekyl wait till 2.0+ >> > >I think we were talking about build file changes. Changing the operation >of -quiet would not be a problem, IMHO.
I am reluctent to make any changes to structure of output because I know that there is at least two houses I know of who run perl scripts over the output. I HATE perl and I guess I could convince them to move to the XMLLogger or whatever ;) but I assume that this is not a isolated case - does any one else know houses who do post-processing on output ? Cheers, Pete *-----------------------------------------------------* | "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, | | and proving that there is no need to do so - almost | | everyone gets busy on the proof." | | - John Kenneth Galbraith | *-----------------------------------------------------*
