on 1/17/01 6:19 PM, "Diane Holt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I agree. I was also confused by where this got changed. I like your idea > of a nested <filter> element for <copy> -- I've also been wanting one > other thing for filtering as well, and that is that the filtersfile be > allowed to reference properties for the replacement value. > > Diane Uh. What is confusing about it? Look at his patch. I applied his patch and then formatted things at 80 cols. I documented this in the commit messages. give me a break ppl... as for the rest of the comments, i will let josh comment. i work with josh and i know he writes good code so i assumed that he would provide patches that you all would agree with. that doesn't seem to be the case, so i will let him defend himself and/or back out the patches as needed. ok? -jon
