Stefan Bodewig wrote: > > In addition - we've removed an experimental feature from > an alpha version, that has been introduced in an alpha > version.
Agreed. > Pete knew I'd be doing it and in this case, I think it's > no real problem. I'm broken. If Avalon were an independent subproject that nobody used, then I wouldn't care so much. If this were a difficult problem to fix, or if Pete wasn't both aware of this and an active developer of Ant, then I would be more understanding. How do we fix the process so that items like this are noticed and addressed earlier? Or that deprecated features are not removed until users who are dependent on that feature have made the change? - Sam Ruby
