Conor MacNeill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We don't want to wait till we get to a release to have featured used > in anger.
right. >> My take on this is that every project that relies on alpha features >> of another project is responsible to track changes in that alpha >> version itself. > > I think a released version of a project must only depend on released > versions of its prerequesite projects. By relying on an alpha > feature of another project, you are making your project alpha as > well. That is OK, but we should expect regular failures on gump. Agreed. > It would be nice to have a single consolidated output of the whole > gump build to easily locate projects that are using deprecated > features. +1 > We can then help those projects to update. Which would require knowledge about both projects, the one getting the depreaction warnings and the one causing them. > Also perhaps each project in gump should have an attached mailing > list which is notified of build failures in the gump system. Great idea. Stefan
