Peter Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 04:42 23/2/01 +1100, Conor MacNeill wrote: >>why? > > why not? ;)
Because doing so would imply our default action is wrong? Don't think so, -emacs should be the exception IMHO. Stefan
Peter Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 04:42 23/2/01 +1100, Conor MacNeill wrote: >>why? > > why not? ;)
Because doing so would imply our default action is wrong? Don't think so, -emacs should be the exception IMHO. Stefan