Conor MacNeill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> From: Peter Donald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> some editors ? All editors that provide this functionality would be >> closer to it ;) > > Maybe all editors that you use, but mine has no problems > whatsoever. I believe you can configure emacs to handle it too. Sure - I think any editor that can parse error messages of compilers can be customized to accept additional regexps, otherwise this feature would be quite limited, wouldn't it. >> >That information is an advantage to me. It helps me know which >> >task is failing. How do you find that out? We agree completely. >> The question is how useful is that in general? How often can you >> not tell where the error is coming from? > When we support multithreading it will be even more important to > know the source of the error. Very important point IMHO. >> I wasn't actually going to bring this issue up to 2.0 though but >> somehow the issue up and pounced ;) How about we keep it as is in >> 1.x for backwards compatability but maybe ant2.0 defaults to the >> standard? > > Nothing is set for 2.0 yet, and everything will be up for > discussion. Right, and could we please release Ant 1.3 and then start this discussion (on Ant2) in a more formal way (I'll post a proposal soon)? Stefan
