At 10:43 26/3/01 +1000, Conor MacNeill wrote: >> * tasks should have access to its own XML representation. > >-1 A task may not have an XML representation. It may have been created >dynamically.
How about if we said TOM (Task object model) or something similar. This type of functionality is vital to implement TaskContainers and keep the engine clean. Would you lift your -1 then ? ;) Cheers, Pete *-----------------------------------------------------* | "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, | | and proving that there is no need to do so - almost | | everyone gets busy on the proof." | | - John Kenneth Galbraith | *-----------------------------------------------------*
