Hi Peter, I would like revisit this for Ant1. I think there is enough demonstrated user need that it makes sense for Ant1. There must be a post every week asking for file attribute based FileSets.
I think that the Culler XML api is structured enough that if we come up with a different API for Ant2 that a XSLT will be easy to write. And, I would like to get it out sooner so that we have feedback for Ant2. dave On Tue, 27 Mar 2001 12:48:18 -0800, David Rees wrote: >On Mon, 26 Mar 2001 19:50:34 +1000, Peter Donald wrote: > >>Hi, >> >>Sorry for not getting back to you earlier. >> >>At 08:39 23/3/01 -0800, David Rees wrote: >>>Attached is my second cut at the culler functionality I mentioned >>>last week. It doesn't include HTML docs yet because I think text will >>>be easier to discuss. If you agree to the submission I can submit the >>>docs pretty quickly. >>> >>>As before, my thoughts for how this "should" be done in Ant2 will be >>>in different post (later). >> >>I just had a look at it and were wondering if you would consider waiting >>for ant2.0 to roll around. The reason is that I am reluctent to add >>anything new to ant1.x that we are not keeping in ant2. It is going to be >>hard enough for our users without this. What do you think ? >> > >I had hoped that they would end up in Ant2 as well ;). The definition >of Culler is basic enough that I think it will survive pretty easily. >I am not really waiting on it for anything however. > >Actually, what is the time frame for Ant2? > >d
