----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter Donald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 9:09 PM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Task API
> At 08:12 17/4/01 +1000, Conor MacNeill wrote: > >> * tasks should have access to its own XML representation. > >> > >> /Task Object Model instead of XML representation/ > > > >-1. > > How do you propose to do container tasks? What is a container task? (I could guess, just want to be clear) Well, The requirement and how it is done are two separate things. I don't believe all tasks need to have access to their Task Object Model. My idea of container tasks is that there will be a separate interface implemented by those tasks which will give the container the definitions of the contained tasks. So, it may be required for some tasks, but not for all. > > (BTW you need to supply a reason for this -1 to be valid) Go ahead, degrade me :-)
