Hi Conor! > > >> At 08:12 17/4/01 +1000, Conor MacNeill wrote: > > >> >> * tasks should have access to its own XML representation. > > >> >> > > >> >> /Task Object Model instead of XML representation/ > > >> > > > >> >-1.
Do you -1 what is behind "*" or the whole thing? Do you -1 a Task Object Model? How would you implement the option of making making a build(-file) "buildable". (Like Antidote wants to do - and currently it isn't easy to implement). Do you agree that it would be nice if the Ant-build-model would be independent from it's persistence (XML at the moment)...? This point is rather impotent to me 4 it influensen Antiodote-Dev MUCH! Greetings, Chris
