At 10:38 17/4/01 +1000, Conor MacNeill wrote: >> >> >> * It should be possible to modify details of the actual build >> >> >> * (e.g. classpath, used compiler) without the need to change the >> >> >> * build specification. >> >> >> > >> >-1 > >Insufficient detail for this to be a valid requirement. What "details"? We >already have this capability. Is this just stating the requirement for the >same level of functionality (build.sysclasspath, build.compiler, etc). If >this said we shouldn;t use magic properties, then I'd agree.
Basically translated it saids - * provide functionality already present in build.* * don't use magic properties * provide a generic mechanism for linking in new aspects Implementation would be via configuring AspectHandlers/Facilities and providing parameters on a per task basis (or some other similar system). Cheers, Pete *-----------------------------------------------------* | "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, | | and proving that there is no need to do so - almost | | everyone gets busy on the proof." | | - John Kenneth Galbraith | *-----------------------------------------------------*
