From: "Peter Donald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > At 10:38 17/4/01 +1000, Conor MacNeill wrote: > >> >> >> * It should be possible to modify details of the actual build > >> >> >> * (e.g. classpath, used compiler) without the need to change the > >> >> >> * build specification. > >> >> > >> > > >> >-1 > > > >Insufficient detail for this to be a valid requirement. What "details"? We > >already have this capability. Is this just stating the requirement for the > >same level of functionality (build.sysclasspath, build.compiler, etc). If > >this said we shouldn;t use magic properties, then I'd agree. > > Basically translated it saids - > * provide functionality already present in build.* > * don't use magic properties
+1 then. > * provide a generic mechanism for linking in new aspects This is the whole namespace - aspect nexus (bingo !), right? I'm OK with that. > > Implementation would be via configuring AspectHandlers/Facilities and > providing parameters on a per task basis (or some other similar system). > Lets not talk implementation yet (hard sometimes)
