At 04:48 8/5/01 -0400, Colin Sampaleanu wrote: >To be fair, the core .jar file from log4j 1.1beta6 is 90k. But I have to >agree, 90k is not that big, and aside from the size difference I think there >are some significant advantages to log4j. Aside from the power and speed, a >lot of people already use it, know it, and trust it.
logkit is faster than log4j and the "power" log4j gives is not power I would desire from a *logging* toolkit. ie * What does internationalisation have to do with logging? * Why use the Stack Introspection hack to get around the fact that code is poorly designed ? (Using IOC means Stack Introspection is not needed). About the only potentially useful thing is the object renderers. While a kewl feature I haven't come across a real life use case for it yet. I assume there are some but ... Cheers, Pete *-----------------------------------------------------* | "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, | | and proving that there is no need to do so - almost | | everyone gets busy on the proof." | | - John Kenneth Galbraith | *-----------------------------------------------------*
