Jose Alberto Fernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Was the original vote based on some very strong arguments or was
> just a go with flow kind of vote? I really have no recollection.
Just looked it up in my archives:
Peter has been +1 on having a common element, I've been +0 and -0
respectively (I saw no real reason for the unified element), Glenn
went -1 (why would we need this, we already have unified ${} handling)
and Conor -1ed it because "People want to feel that they are dealing
with filesets, not properties which happen to be filesets."
> If we come to believe, given the current more concrete picture, that
> architecturally it would be better to do something different from
> what was voted, I do not see why this cannot be discussed.
Didn't mean to imply that.
Stefan
